27/10/2009
Danielle Boden
elu6d2
E-Publishing
Lecture 5
Blog 5
E-Publishing:
What effect will technology have on publishing in the 21st century. Looking primarily at direct effects. Think about the ‘shop of technologies’ and how it is going to affect the role of their business.
What are the ramifications of e-publishing?Looking online at the
BBC
News pages this gives an example of how technology (e-publishing in particular) has changed. You will have a typical BBC News story which until approximately 10 years ago would have been submitted to the general public via broadcasting on television reading only the first few lines of the press release.
If it were the
Guardian writing there would be more writing.
At this time also people would have written in to comment.
Example of how the process of a story and distributed and commented on last decade;
- Headline.
- Editorial.
- Comments from the public, which are sifted through at the publisher’s choice.
- Gone by the following week unless you went to a local library archive.
This is seizing to happen by today with the World Wide Web, giving us a new version of the news.
-
WWW.BBCNEWS.CO.UK - Main Headline.
- Story.
- Question and Answer on main story page.
- Many child pages in relation to the news story, summary, backgrounds.
- Hypertext, linking one story to another, BUT it is not so much a multi media platform yet.
- Not one person writes the story. Several people do. (Extra, differing reports from other reporters).
- Video’s – Most written stories now have a video in conjunction with the story that has been hyperlinked. This is an interesting factor because hyperlinks connect to external sites that are not the BBC. They are showing readers their sources – direct lines to them.
- Features/Views/Analysis.
- You an bookmark the story or the website onto a social networking site this making you become part of the news by distributing it and promoting the story to others as you believe that it is interesting/important. (If people don’t think that news is not important then it is not news).
- You choose what you read.
What you can see from these lists is that there has been a considerable change in the way in which news is distributed from the 20th through to the 21st century.

When a newspaper is published they place their stories into a particular order to assist the manipulation of the eye into looking at specific stories.
However, when you are online this is different.

When looking at a story online and clicking from hyperlink to hyperlink you can very quickly loose which page you are on. Technologists are looking for a way to prevent this online problem with web browsers but nothing has been discovered as yet.
Videos are another issues with online news.
Videos are put with written stories for several reasons; to give the reader the option to read the story or view it (possibly both if you wish), to see two sides of the story (although it is the same story line that is being published when you read something to when you watch it you can interpret it in a different way). However, the issue with videos is that they can be very slow in uploading and actually don’t contain the level of detail that a written story would have.
Technologies;- Hyperlinks, enable you to jump from one story to another.
- Video/Audio, sometimes a video is useful for an audience but most literate people would choose to read a story rather than watch it as you can choose what you read and you get more detail as to what the news is (you can easily skip what you watch plus most of the time there is advertising at the beginning of the video). Despite this, if it is a sports item it is the reverse. People would rather see the action (what’s happened?) rather than read about it.
Does an online facility of the news elevate a story?It is a fact that it is very good to give a reader the option to read in the newspaper, online or watch a video, but does having an article online or a video change the story? It does in some respects in that it can add a level of emotion through video that a newspaper article couldn’t unless they were using prolific details.
Technologies have epitomised the notion of taking a story out of context and turning it into truth. Nevertheless, is all this choice a good thing?What is happening in today’s news is that stories are being made out of nothing as due to constant 24/7 news there is a need to fill the slots. The news stations are rushed to produce news and as a result sometimes not enough information is gathered before the story is written or broadcasted and the consequence of this is that audiences quickly loose interest.
The BBC is not the most current online news distributor. If you at American newspaper websites or television news websites what they do that the BBC don’t is allow reader’s to comment freely on an article, whatever their thoughts maybe. The BBC doesn’t carry comments online in the way that they do in America such as the Washington Post where there is always at least 1 comment whereby someone disagrees with the article or what someone else has commented on. Therefore, technology is allowing readers to comment immediately on the story without any editing or pre-approval.
So,
why does the BBC not do this? The BBC does not do this due to one of their core values: ‘to be impartial’. However this could be construed to be slightly hypercritical because it is the BBC whom decides whose comments are published in conjunction with the news story. Their argument would be that is there were only slanderous comments, or only positive comments they would not be fulfilling their remit and also another one of their values is o ‘educate’ and if there are unedited incorrectly spelt comments on their website once again this would result in incorrect procedure.
What is the effect of these comments on a news story?The first problem created by this is that we don’t know who wrote the comments as when online people use usernames and these comments and change the interpretation of a story.
The Gatekeeper;A person who controls what content and information goes through the gate (website or written article). However by today the publisher is not quite the gatekeeper that they used to be.
Quotes lead in stories as they do with videos and you have to be in the game to play the game.
ACHIPELAGO
A system whereby you could post and view creative writing or free but you work had to be pre approved and edited before publishing and printing. Journals.
There was an American poet called
Emily Dickenson wrote hundreds of poems which during her life not one of them were published as she didn’t send them off to any magazines, newspapers or publishing houses to ask for publishing. It wasn’t until after her death that the pile of poetry was discovered and was published.
Soft systems methodologies and hard systems methodologies.
If you are the gatekeeper and you read something and you like it does it mean it is good? No.
If you like it does it mean that your friends will like it and other readers? No.
In = Poems and stories
Out = Content of the journal.
For this to happen people have to be involved.
INPUTS = Writer who produces
Editor completes a quality check.
Reviewer, is there for a second opinion.
Graphic designers.
Web designers.
Who benefits from this?
Who is the client?
Who wants to content? People who are interested in the content of the journal and are web literate.
Who can stop this? If you don’t fill a journal on a regular basis the funding will stop.
C - Client = Reader
A - Actors = Writers, editors, reviewers
T -Transformation = Technicians, web designers etc…
W - World view = What does everyone else think of it? Reader’s, publishing houses, importance?
O - Owner = Is the writer or the publisher?
E - Environment = Lulu, Amazon. Similar content, technology changes, people stop buying paper and only do things online.
Lulu; If you were a publishing company and you were going to use lulu to create your book then Amazon would sell and ship it out for you how would the process work?
Input = Production (ACTORS) = Client (OUTPUT) =
Technology Lulu Readers – People who are interested
Design Writers in that genre/subject.
Ink Editors
Content Reviewers
Paper
Printing
Facilities
Lulu; What does it enhance?
- Makes one thing bigger by helping to distribute it promoting it to a wider audience.
- Good for creating and giving gifts on special occasions.
- Saves money on mass-producing books that may not sell and only publish on demand.
- Extends the life of a book as can be saved and reproduced at any time.
- More design options, you can reinvent old novels.
- Encourages more people to write.
What does it replace?- Publishing agencies.
- Printer agencies.
- No choice
- Bookstores
- Warehouses
- Transport
- Carbon emissions (on the other hand you could argue that it increases carbon emissions because despite initially reducing it as postmen are not delivering vans of books some of which may go unsold but now have t make smaller journeys more often to deliver the odd book or two.)
What does it revive?- Postal service
- Creative writing/courses
- Out of print texts to be revived and re-read.
- Limited appeal
- Love of books
- Small publishing houses.
Thank you for taking the time to read my blog this week.
Blog ya' later!
elephants_are_supercool